Modern Art. New. Bold.
Maybe a bit Confusing. But HEY; it's ArT.
I recently strolled my
way through a contemporary art museum and saw some interesting pieces. One
piece that interested me the most was Hotel Monturiol (2011-12) by Jorge Méndez Blake. Now this piece features a
photo, various illustrations, and building plans (even a small
sculpture). All of these elements and noted belonged to a man known as Narciso
Monturiol, who died in 1885, and found by his great-grandson Raul Monturiol.
Narcisco, if you didn't know, was the engineer who created the Ictineo I and
II, the II being the first air independent and combustion powered submarine. He
did his work in Spain. It is said that the inspiration for the Hotel was formulated
when he saw the beauty and mysticism of the below-sea-level world and wanted to
share it with more people than a crew of four to five. If one looks closely at
the photo and illustrations, one can see that there are no windows in the
building but there are patios and skylights drawn to let daylight stream in. This
makes it seem as if he were trying to with much intent to create an underwater
experience above ground with stone and marble. There are other aspects to the
notes like a library, a patio, underground sections, and a list of different
materials he would have used if he had decided to build the place. One cannot
fully know the extent to which the project would have been taken on or the
vision he was headed towards between the few and some seemingly unrelated
drawings. It is however definite that he wanted to create an underwater experience
to whomever would be residing in the hotel which is seen by the restriction of
light, the reflection and exquisiteness of the marble, and the image and statue
of coral.
The way the elements of
the piece are arranged by Blake are not publicly known. At first I took it to
be a strange form of key for some odd reason. Then I thought "What if the way it was arranged was supposed
to appear as an aerial view of the hotel?" And then I began to think
that the arrangement of the piece had no real significance. I feel from his
inclusion of marble and coral to reflect the hard and cold reflectivity of the
underwater land and fish. The darkness with rays of light represents how it
looks when the sun pierces the sea.
I think this piece
reflects how the past can speak to the present and can be translated into
future actions. The exhibit that the piece is displayed in is called “Limited Visibility”
This could express how we, the viewers, couldn't see the work that went in to
this vision, can’t see the value in it, and can’t see the person who created
it, but the memory of Monturiol and his work have survived the test of time to
be viewed by all now and heading in the future.

Very cool thoughts- I like that you thought about different views of the piece and how that might change its meaning.
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis! I liked how you included background information on the artist and the piece. Knowing the background of the piece really helps with undestanding it as a whole. It caused me to look at the piece differently. For instance, knowing his interest in submarines helped me understand the motive behind his creativity and how he wanted to model the hotel after under the sea. I liked how you looked at specific details in the piece to justify that intention. Also, I liked how you connected it to the theme of limited visibility because I feel like there are a lot of pieces that have unknown artists or purposes behind them, and it's left to the viewers to think about them after such a long time.
ReplyDelete